Friday, January 20, 2017

Donald J. Trump and the Peaceful Transfer of Power

Donald J. Trump and the Peaceful Transfer of Power

As I am watching C-SPAN (Jan. 20, 2017), I’m  hearing a lot of people saying what a joyous day this is  (the first 5 callers at 7am- it was like I was listening to talk radio-lol) and also there was glee about how our peaceful transfer of power is envied around the world- the latter point I agreed with for the more than 2 decades (closer to 3 decades to be honest) that I’ve been following politics.  But we cannot embrace a peaceful transfer of power and ignore a presidential candidate inviting a foreign entity to get involved in our elections (especially when it appears that they did). We cannot embrace a peaceful transfer of power and ignore the suppression of the vote that has taken place since the Shelby v. Holder U.S. Supreme Court ruling, but was stoked following the election of President Obama (if you go back and read some of the headlines and comments by politicians and others following the 15th Amendment extending the right to vote to Blacks (males) you will see some of the same types of measures to limit the vote.  Our democracy should be expanded not limited simply because you have the power to do so, or are upset because you don’t like the outcome of an election. Win the next on ideals, not on interference and suppression.  A peaceful transfer of power must be accompanied by the continued protection of the right to vote, not attempting to remove it with surgical precision, as a federal judge said of actions by the North Carolina Legislative Body to enact voting reforms.

I turned down an opportunity to talk to a reporter about Trump’s Inauguration speech because, while I will read it later, I am not sure that I can watch him deliver it. I am not sure that I can see Senate Majority Mitch McConnell and not think about how hard he worked to ensure that Obama was a one-term president and when that didn’t work, to continue to obstruct his policies- he may have attended Obama’s inauguration, but he led an 8 year anti-Obama agenda- which was not in pursuit of what was best for the U.S.  He stole, yes, stole, an U.S. Supreme Court justice from Obama and, as Obama said in his 60 Minutes interview, received no political backlash as a result. In fact he emerges as a more powerful person than before and his wife gets to serve in another administration.  I can’t watch that smirk on McConnell’s face.  We can’t embrace a peaceful transfer of power while knowing how the person who is being sworn in got there.  He ran a campaign that appealed to our worst instincts, he called President Obama stupid, and was actually the founder of ISIS- like he was an uncover member of ISIS and, by extension, using the presidency to help them grow intentionally, his mission, is what we can read into his comments, he said our generals were rubble, he attacked first responders because they would not allow for more people in an already packed room, he mocked a disabled reporter, he got into a fight with a Gold Star Family, and his Make America Great line is as unifying as a Milli Vanilli reunion.  And during his first debate, he was asked this question by then Fox News host Megan Kelley: “You’ve called women you don’t like “fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals.” (http://time.com/3988276/republican-debate-primetime-transcript-full-text/) Trump’s short response was “only Rosie O’Donnell” (ibid), but after the debate concluded he accused Megan Kelly of being aggressive in her questioning of him because “blood was coming out of her whatever” (http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/08/politics/donald-trump-cnn-megyn-kelly-comment/).  There were consistent themes of misogyny and sexism throughout his campaign. And this doesn’t include the Billy Bush tapes. I suppose it is fitting that Justice Clarence Thomas is swearing him in as they may have a lot to talk about when the women folk aren’t around, you, know, comparing stories of how one can sexually harass women- Trump would put a tic tac in his mouth and go on it when he sees a beautiful woman, Thomas prefers the more subtle use of coke can.  

Donald Trump spent years and a lot of money attempting to make President Obama to not look like the legitimate office holder by questioning his origin of birth.  Article II of the United States Constitution has only three requirements to run for the Office of the Presidency- an age requirement (at least 35), a residency requirement (14 year residency in US), and that one is a natural born citizen.  When you question whether a president met that requirement, you question their legitimacy.  Trump, being the thin-skinned person that he is, has the audacity to pick a twitter fight with Rep. John Lewis, who put his life on the line so that the right to vote (and equality) can be expanded to all Americans.   When we are embracing a peaceful transfer of power, we have to also embrace elections where candidates aren’t inviting foreign interference and the crass pursuit of power doesn’t result in weakening access to the ballot box.  And you can’t have FBI Directors to share information that is inconsequential about one political candidate, but remain silent when you have information about Russian involvement in an effort to promote one candidate over another. This isn’t right. Donald Trump may prove to be a great president, he may prove to bring jobs to rural and inner cities, but he hasn’t proven that he has the temperate, the humility, the unifying nature to be the president that will continue to move the U.S. forward on so many levels.  And I won’t even talk about his Cabinet choices right now.

As much as I support our democracy (republic), the good, the bad and the ugly, and as much as I will continue to encourage young people to pursue their dreams, to believe in the system, to stay engaged, and to be the change they want to see, today at noon, I just don’t think I can watch the swearing in of Donald J. Trump. 

Peace,


Artemesia Stanberry


Note: With regard to Justice Clarence Thomas, he administered the oath of office to VP Mike Pence, I thought I'd read that instead of the Chief Justice administering the oath of office to Trump, that it would be Thomas instead. My comments still stand, nevertheless:).

Monday, November 14, 2016

President-elect Trump: Surprised, Shocked, But Should Have Saw it Coming

This began as a Facebook post, but ended up being too long, so I am putting it in a blog. It is a quick, stream of consciousness monologue:). 

I’m thinking about President-elect Donald Trump as I have done so very often since his election. I watched his 60 Minutes interview and commented on it in a separate post. But what he said about attendance at his rallies is what I want to focus on in this post.  Trump said that at midnight (morning of Election Day) that had a rally in Michigan scheduled the day before. Over 31,000 people were in attendance, according to Trump. When Trump first announced his candidacy, he started drawing very large crowds, including a large crowd in Mobile, AL.  I said, sure, he can draw large crowds off his celebrity, but will his audience go out to vote.  We will see when the first vote takes place during the Iowa Caucus.  He came in second in Iowa.  And then he wins New Hampshire, and South Carolina, as I recall, which means that the evangelical community embraced him,  and then, at that time, we should have realized that he had a momentum that Obama had after winning Iowa, that this is what his supporters needed to see to stay with him.  

So he wins the nomination and then we said  yeah, he won the primaries, those are hard core members of his party and other excuses for his win, but we concluded that he could never win a general election voter base. He did. Trump, we have to admit, ran an amazing campaign as a candidate.  A slogan that his supporters could relate to, and anti-establishment sentiment, an anti-immigrant sentiment, economic angst, racial angst (yes, I said it, when the response to the concerns about police brutality and the criminal justice system that disprortionately impacts the Black community, is treated with a counter movement that seeks less to understand the issues that have been present for decades, this takes us back to a consistent backlash that African Americans have experienced when they've tried to advocate for justice and equality) the perception that Pres. Obama has made American weak and so on. His rallies became a place where like-minded supporters could feel good and comfortable supporting someone that they may not have really felt had the temperament nor the preparedness to be president. 

I vehemently disagree with the way he campaigned- this is why so many people are protesting- you can’t walk back the blanket statements about immigrants, a religion, the sexism and misogyny, the assumptions about Black people and their living conditions, racial anxiety (again, yes, I said it- to think that White Lives do not Matter when people say Black Lives matter is truly not understanding the history of this country and the allocation of justice in this country) and so on. First of all, only he and his supporters can get away with saying that America is not great. And one still has to explain to me which era are you referring to when you say “again.” Perhaps Steve Bannon will enlighten us on thatJ. Obama has to run on hope and change, if he added- because American is not great right now, he would have received such a backlash.  “If you don’t think America is great, then leave.” I saw people post that a lot on their facebook posts in response to angry Clinton supporters and I’m sure the persons saw no irony in their post.

In sum, people will be studying the Trump campaign for many years to come.  Dissertations and books will be written about it.  He left no vote unturned, as he and his family stated during the campaign, Trump himself (not surrogates) went from state to states- sometimes several in a day during the latter stages of the campaign as they did not assume that they had any state.  Trump said that he had 31,000 people at his rally at midnight (day of the Election) in Michigan- at state that is still too close to call, right. That should have been Clinton’s state to win outright. Trump, who received no major newspaper endorsements (I think he had 2 endorsements total), who didn’t receive public support from the Republican establishment, who would not back down from his more controversial comments, won the presidency at the end of the day.  As American citizens, we have a right to be upset, to protest, to feel sad (just as Trump supporters would feel and act had he lost), but, for better or worse, he has won the presidency, and he has a Republican Congress. Will he keep his campaign promises? He is already adding an addendum to his repeal Obamacare message. 

President-elect Trump will be our president for at least 4 years, unless he resigns or is impeached. We should not wish anything bad on him, just like would did not want anything bad (and you know what I mean) to fall upon President Obama.  2020 is around the corner, 2018 is even closer, and your local elections are even closer, in the meantime, if you are a political junkie as I am, for a couple of months, find a hobby, take some time to yourself, go on vacation if you can, because after January 20th, 2017, it is going to be quite an adventure seeing how President Trump (not campaigner and celebrity Trump) will really deal with these urgent domestic and foreign policies.  It makes me a bit nervous, but maybe now Trump will start to sound and be presidential. I personally wish that his cabinet picks were not ideologues and Washington insiders- maybe even a couple of Democrats- oh, but only Obama was expected to carry out that team of rivals stuff- you know, so you wouldn’t be frightened by how he governed. 

That’s all.  

Peace,

Artemesia Stanberry

My previous post on this blog: http://alabamajustice.blogspot.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-protests-and.html

Monday, July 18, 2016

Black Lives Matter: Protests and Terrorism

July 18th

Black Lives Matter: Protests and Terrorism


I began this message as a Facebook post, but it had gotten to be too long, so I am posting it as a blog. Before I begin, let me reiterate what I’ve said many times and that is that I deplore violence and do not believe that it is justified to pursue a cause.  I will also repeat what I said about how attacking a law enforcement officer, in my opinion, is a selfish act and serves no purpose other than to silence a peaceful protest movement.  I continue to support the message behind the Black Lives Matter movement, it is not anti-police.  As I’ve stated after hearing about the police shootings/killings in Baton Rouge on Sunday (July 17th): “I was actually getting back into watching cable news, enjoying the campaign coverage via MSNBC and then I see breaking news, more officers shot and apparently killed. I don't know the details, but messages are lost when people engage in vigilante justice. People who engage in shootings are not helping the Black Lives Matter movement, legitimate protests for accountability, and helping individuals who do not understand and get what the fuss about, to get it. Shooting an officer is a selfish act, it is not engaging in legitimate protests;it is silencing it. Again, I don't know the details, but the public should realize that these shootings do not represent the vast majority of protesters and sympathizers. Life is precious; it is also fragile and unpredictable.”
With the above said,  I said that today I would avoid the news today and commenting on it, but then I read an article about a petition wanting President Obama to declare Black Lives Matter a terrorist organization, citing the law enforcement officers killed in recent weeks (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-responds-to-petition-to-label-black-lives-matter-a-terror-group/). During the peaceful protests in the 1960s, so many people were killed and brutally beaten by law enforcement and by INDIVIDUALS in the White community (not all, not most). Would we retroactively call Bull Connor, Commissioner of Public Safety in Birmingham (look him up if you must) a terrorist? Gov. Ross Barnett (Gov. of Mississippi- Medgar Evers was assassinated in his driveway under his watch and rhetoric, riots occurred when James Meredith tried to integrate the University of Mississippi and Barnett went to a football game and gave a half-time giving a defiant speech about segregation and the federal government interring with the way they treated Blacks. Gov. Wallace?  The University of Alabama has put of a plaque and devoted space to Autherine Lucy’s attempt to integrate the university in 1956- riots took place by students protesting her attempted enrollment.  The same at the University of Georgia when Charlyne Hunter and Hamilton Holmes attempted to integrate the school. Many of you are familiar with Fannie Lou Hamer (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/biography/freedomsummer-hamer/). Are you familiar with what happened to her in a jail when she was arrested for having the audacity of helping people to vote- she was pulled off a bus along with other passengers and taken to jail, beaten severely at the request of the jail guards- and she wasn’t the only one. If you get a chance to hear her very difficult recollections of it, please do so.  Even Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr’s house was bombed as a result of his peaceful protests.  Dr. King, the peace leader, the preacher of nonviolence and one of my heroes, experienced violence and he experienced criticism for agitating people- please review his Letter From a Birmingham Jail, why he wrote it, and to whom it was addressed.  Who would we blame for the bombing of his house? Dr. King? The protesters?  Or individuals who wanted to deal with issues and change in their own way? The violence and murders took place while peaceful protesters were trying to address serious issues, tying to seek justice and equality, yet, they experienced both state sanctioned violence and violence of vigilantes who wanted to take matters into their own hands because they did not want change. They feared change.  

Did most white Southerners and Americans support these actions, certainly not, but they could not control the violent actions of others- the State could have, but not individuals.  The state perpetuated the violence in too many ways. So if you want to start labeling Black Lives Matter a terrorist organization, then let’s start the naming retroactively.  A country that refuses to understand its history and opts to hear the voices of people who whitewashes it will never get a grasp on why people are still hurting and demanding accountability- not for what happened in the past, but from what is happening today- AND how the past has shaped the present.  The people who are engaged in these violent shootings believe that protests are not enough and they are doing the very wrong thing. Life is too sacred to take indiscriminately.

People peaceably protesting during the Civil Rights Movement and Anti-Vietnam War protests (remember Kent State, oh, also remember Jackson State) faced violence that they incited simply by peaceably protesting.  These protestors included children, remember what happened during the children’s campaign-children joining Dr. King in a day of protests- police didn’t like that, the fire hoses and police dogs were fiercely used against these kids. Protesters included people travelling from their home states to protest- Blacks and Whites, and when you listen to some of the footage courtesy of Eyes on the Prize, you hear some Whites saying that it was whites coming from other places causing the violence. So, again, let’s be careful with the rhetoric and with associating individuals with violent solutions on their minds with people trying to work within the system using the tools of the U.S. Constitution- the right to peaceably assemble, the right to protest, it is in that amendment that comes before the 2nd Amendment.  


Dr. King once told Harry Belafonte that he fears that he has integrated his people into a burning house. He said, according to Belafonte, that we must become the firemen, we must not stand by and let the house burn. Since the 1960s, we have seen a rise in mass incarceration, unjust treatment of marginalized communities, the militarization of police officers, legislation such as the 100-1 disparity in treatment between crack and powder cocaine, that led to a rise of non-violent offenders in prison for long prison terms,  the Rampart Scandal with the LAPD, Chicago’s Police detective Jon Borge indicted for two decades of torturing mostly Black men, forcing them to confess to crimes they did not commit, prisons making profits by filling the prisons and so many other issues that trapped people into communities without opportunities, jobs, adequate schools and so on, that you can read in Ta-Nehisi Coates piece on reparations that are related to conditions in many communities, and Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow and so many other books and articles. And, read Douglas Blackmon’s Slavery By Another Name (or watch the PBS documentary based on his book).  
People were upset, angry and demanding reforms before President Obama even stepped into office. I recently watched the movie Straight Outta Compton- finally- and was reminded by one of their songs about the police (you know the one) and the portrayal of why they felt that way. By the way, I heard a rap artist say that he would stop portraying violence in his music, this, too, is progress.  C. Delores Tucker advocated for this two decades ago.  At the same time, I am aware of what I believe it was Chuck D. who said that rap music is the CNN of the Black community, meaning that it is articulating of the violence seen within the community, which is what Meek Mill says in his announcement that he will soon stop portraying extreme violence (http://www.complex.com/music/2016/07/meek-mill-vows-stop-rapping-extreme-violence-after-dreamchasers-4)   We need to address the conditions in these communities not by excessive use of force. Let’s have a Marshall type plan to address widespread unemployment in inner cities and rural areas so that people can have job security, let’s address what is happening with underfunded schools and the ever present school to prison pipeline, let’s address how prison privatization and mass incarceration leads to poor laws and enforcement of said laws, and let’s acknowledge that impact that slavery, segregation, and mass incarceration continue to have in this society in the area of policing and in the area of trust in policing.


 Black on Black crime is an issue, as is White on White Crime, as is human on human crime, and human on animal crime, crime should be addressed, we do not want to live in a lawless society.  But when it is perceived (and the data show) that the state has disproportionately targeting individuals of certain groups and that there is no accountability, then that continues to anger people.  I was watching AM Joy with Joy Reid on Sunday morning when the breaking news occurred about the shootings of police officers in Baton Rouge.  Joy Reid had earlier interviewed the mother of Tamir Rice, the 12 year old kid killed within seconds of a police’s arrival on the scene and she said that she was disappointed in Lebron James for remaining silent and at President Obama for not doing enough to address what has happened to her son and others.  The daughter of Eric Garner expressed the same frustration.  I listened to a caller to a conservative talk radio show out of Mobile, AL who shared the experiences that he has heard from young, Black men. He said that the teenagers wanted him to ask the Police Chief why is it that when they are standing around with their friends, that police officers come up to them and demand that they get on the ground, and when it is raining, they have to lie on the ground  with their faces in the mud.  They asked why does this happen and what can be done. The host pondered and wondered aloud what did they do wrong; that they would have to get on the ground. He could not imagine this just happening. The assumption that far too many people make is that Tamir Rice did something wrong, Eric Garner did something wrong, John Crawford did something wrong, Sandra Bland did something wrong, Freddie Gray is responsible for his own death, and so on. People are asking for accountability. People are asking for fairness in policing.  People are asking for similar discretion to be used across racial lines. If a white male were in a car with a female and a child sitting in the back seat, would shots be fired into a car when an officer had a clear view of each individual? If a White male is shopping at a Walmart in the toy gun section- in an open carry state, would he immediately be shot, no questions asked? If a kid is in a White kid is in a park with a toy gun, would an officer open fire within seconds after his arrival?  

People are asking for criminal justice reform. People are asking for unity. People who commit violence will do so regardless; they are not the voices of the people.   And police shootings, while we hope they will end, are not new. Here is data from the Washington Post showing that more police shootings took place during the Reagan era than the Obama Administration- did Reagan provoke people to shoot officers, did he just not get it, or whatever else has been said about Obama, does it apply to Reagan? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/09/police-are-safer-under-obama-than-they-have-been-in-decades/

I referenced Dr. King’s quote about his being afraid that he is integrating his people into a burning house.  He said that we need more firemen. In President Obama’s  President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing and the policy solutions put together by protesters, activists and researchers located on campaignzero.org.  you will see people trying to by the firemen.  This is not new, social media is new, activism via social media is new, recordings of shooting incidents is new, but the anger, pain, desire for change, that is not new. That is all.

Peace,

Artemesia

Throughout our nation’s history, there have been people of all races joining in to fight against injustice.  During the Civil Rights Movement, many are aware of Viola Liuzzo, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, and other portrayed in movies, but here is an individual who picked up a sign and started walking, walking for justice, another fireman.  His name is William Moore- From the Equal Justice Initiative’s History of Racial Injustice timeline (http://racialinjustice.eji.org/timeline/):
APRIL 23rd, 1963
William Moore Killed During One-Man Civil Rights March to Mississippi
On April 23, 1963, the body of William L. Moore was found on U.S. Highway 11 near Attalla, Alabama, only four days shy of his 36th birthday. Moore, a white man, was in the midst of a one-man civil rights march to Jackson, Mississippi, to implore Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett to support integration efforts. He wore signs that stated: “End Segregation in America, Eat at Joe's-Both Black and White” and “Equal Rights For All (Mississippi or Bust).”
Moore, a resident of Baltimore, Maryland, was a member of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and had staged other lone protests in the past. On his first protest, he walked to Annapolis, Maryland, from Baltimore. On his second march, he walked to the White House. For his third and final march, he planned to walk from Chattanooga, Tennessee, to Jackson.
About 70 miles into the march, a local radio station reporter named Charlie Hicks interviewed Moore after the radio station received an anonymous tip of his whereabouts. After the interview, Hicks offered to drive Moore to a hotel where he would be safe, but Moore continued on his march instead. Less than an hour later, a passing motorist found his body.
Moore had been shot in the head with a .22-caliber rifle that was traced to Floyd Simpson, a white Alabamian. Simpson was arrested but never indicted for Moore's murder. When activists from the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and CORE attempted to finish Moore’s march using the same route, they were beaten and arrested by Alabama State Troopers.



This country can decide whether it wants to sign petitions declaring Black Lives Matter a terrorist group, to listen to people to label the call for police accountability with anti-police behavior is the best way to unite and move forward, or to move in the direction that will make this representative democracy stronger, safer, bigger, brighter, and great for everyone.  In the article that I read this morning that led to this blog is this quote:
“The White House then went further: Acknowledging that it was a "difficult time" for the country -- and that the debate remains a "charged" one -- the statement additionally prompted petition signers to consider President Obama's words calling for compassion towards the movement.

"I think it's important for us to also understand that the phrase 'black lives matter' simply refers to the notion that there's a specific vulnerability for African Americans that needs to be addressed," the president said last week, talking to a Washington, D.C. gathering of enforcement officials, civil rights leaders, elected officials and other activists on the issue of racial disparities in the criminal justice system. "We shouldn't get too caught up in this notion that somehow people who are asking for fair treatment are somehow, automatically, anti-police, are trying to only look out for black lives as opposed to others. I think we have to be careful about playing that game."” http://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-responds-to-petition-to-label-black-lives-matter-a-terror-group/

In conclusion, we are all human beings, first and foremost.  Even those in the most violent communities deserve to be treated fairly and justly.  We can continue to pick and choose people who we agree with and ridicule/ignore/dismiss  those that we do not, or we can take what has happened in recent weeks as one of those growing pains and figure out how to move forward in a positive direction.  There are many who are already marginalized who will look at the lack of accountability and say you see, this is how it has always been and how it will always will be, so let’s just stop trying.  We can no more allow that attitude to fester than we can of those who believe that Black people are responsible for the individual and state sanctioned violence perpetuated against them.  The Civil Rights era wasn’t an easy one, constant death and brutality, marked by achievements, the national heartache that our nation is currently dealing with will not be east to get through, but we can, we must and we will, but we can’t do so by remaining in our respective corners.



Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Michael Phelps-Where is the Outrage- ReDux

October 1, 2014
Michael Phelps-Where is the Outrage- ReDux
Olympic gold medalist, many times over, has made news again for driving under the influence. Following his arrest, Phelps tweeted that he was sorry to have let everyone down and that he understands the severity of his actions and takes full responsibility for his actions. “According to Maryland Transportation Authority Police, Phelps was arrested at 1:40 a.m. Tuesday and charged with driving under the influence after an officer clocked Phelps’ 2014 Land Rover traveling 84 mph in a 45-mph zone. Police said that he crossed double yellow lines while driving inside the Fort McHenry Tunnel on northbound Interstate 95, and that he later failed a field sobriety test.” http://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/will-michael-phelps-new-dui-charge-dim-his-sponsorship-gold-n215206  The discussion surrounding Phelps’ latest arrest his what will his sponsors do.  While listening to an online radio show (The Bachelor Pad), the hosts went deeper with regard to the double standard that seems to be exhibited toward Michael Phelps. I listened with interest because I, too, questioned whether Phelps would be held responsible for his actions. I wrote an op-ed nearly a decade ago, following Phelps’ DUI arrest in 2004, that if Congress were as serious about drinking and driving among our youth (Phelps was under 21- he was 19) as they claimed to have been about fighting the war on drugs, then Phelps would have been used as the face of drinking and driving as a means to address the issue and to get young people to understand the severity of drinking and driving under the influence of a controlled substance.  Below is a copy of that unpublished op-ed.  It was saved to my email account.  The email is intact as it was written in draft form- I resided in Houston at the time. Further, I cannot locate the final version of the op-ed submission:
“hello (please proof if you have time)
Artemesia Stanberry  Jan 18, 2005
To         
----
Hey, ---.  I hope you are doing well.  I went to see Coach Carter.  It was good, and yes, I cried.
 Attached is a rough draft of the shortened version of my piece on Phelps.  I have a longer version that i will shop around.  The Washington Post wants submissions for its op-ed to be between 600-800 words.  Let me know what you think about this.  Please feel free to offer any comments.
 Peace,
 Artie
 AStanberry
OpEd Piece on Michael’s Phelp’s drunk driving incident
Rough draft

Where is the outrage?

Last November, 19 year old Olympic star Michael Phelps was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol.  He was stopped by a Maryland state trooper who saw him run a stop sign.  In December, Phelp’s was given his sentence; a $250 fine, one mandatory attendance of a meeting sponsored by Mother’s Against Drinking and Driving, a series of lectures to young people about the dangers of drinking and driving, and  probation.  His record may be expunged if he follows the terms of his probation. In addition, unlike others on probation, he doesn’t have to meet his probation officer in person.  He’s so busy, sayeth the judge, that he can simply call his probation officer once a month. The more serious charges of underage drinking, driving under the influence, and failure to stop at a stop sign were dropped by prosecutors.  Phelps was essentially given a slap on the wrist for crimes that could have caused his death and the death of others.  In Maryland , where Phelps is from and where the crimes took place, in 2003 there were 646 total traffic deaths.  According to statistics found on MADD’s website, approximately forty percent of these deaths were alcohol related.   Drinking and driving is a serious issue.  As MADD, the organization that Phelps have to engage with for one meeting, says ..
“A drunk driver knows or should know that getting behind the wheel will likely cause serious injury or death to him/herself or innocent people on the roadways.” 

Phelps said after his arrest “Last week, I made a mistake, Getting into a car after anything to drink is wrong.  It’s dangerous and unacceptable.  I’m 19 and was taught that no matter how old you are, you should take responsibility for your actions, which I will do. I am sorry.”(insert source)  Well, in 2003, 25 percent of 15- to 20-year-old drivers killed in motor vehicle crashes had been drinking. Nineteen percent were intoxicated (insert source).  This is Phelps’ age group.  Fortunately no one was killed but Phelps could have very well have been among those statistics. If he were, would he have been the Len Bias of Alcohol related laws.

 Len Bias was a star athlete at the University of Maryland with a prime future in the sports arena.  Indeed, he was drafted to play with the Boston Celtics in 1986 when he died of a drug overdose.  It was believed at the time that he died of a crack cocaine overdose, congress was outraged that such a good boy, from a good family with a promising career could be brought down by crack cocaine.  That year, using Len Bias as an example, Congress wrote some of the harshest laws regarding crack cocaine.   A person can receive a mandatory minimum of 5 years from 5 grams of crack cocaine– even for the mere possession of this small amount.  It doesn’t matter if the person is a first time offender.  A 19 year old caught would end up spending the next 5 years of his life in prison, no matter how much he apologized for his youthful mistake.  Maryland is the state of both the Bias and Phelps case.  Phelps, if politicians were truly serious about the dangers of youthful drinking, should be used as a stimulus (use another word) to make a federal mandatory minimum law for drinking and driving.  They should insist that Phelps serve prison time and name a bill after him– the Michael Phelps Anti-Alcohol abuse Act.  It is only then, if we are to believe the rhetoric explaining the wholesale incarceration of youth and others from crack cocaine violations, that young people will get the message that there are true consequences to drinking and driving.  The current message that they receive from the Phelps’ slap on the wrist is that if you apologize, you, too, can go on with your life without the consequences of a nasty prison record.  Phelps, as the news stories tell us, is the big man on campus at the University of Michigan (crack offenders lose out of college education opportunities because Congress says drug violators can’t get federal student loans), he has a million dollar contract with a swim suit company, and he was bombarded with autograph seekers after his sentencing hearing.  This is no message to send to young people, members of Congress should be on the Floor of the House sending a message to the youth about this just as they did after Len Bias’ death.  The fact that Congress is silent on Michael Phelps’ arrest, conviction, and light sentence is “dangerous and unacceptable.”

Artemesia Stanberry
Houston , TX
phelpsshortversion.docDownloadView
____________________________________________________
A sign off on October 1, 2014
Peace,
Artemesia Stanberry





Friday, December 13, 2013

Why Burton LeFlore Should Appear on the Uncle Henry Show


By Artemesia Stanberry

December 13th, 2013

Why Burton LeFlore Should Appear on the Uncle Henry Show

Local talk radio is at its best when it discusses local issues.  The election of President Obama has been a dominant discussion- not just his election and reelection, but everything he does- from trying to extend health care coverage to taking a “selfie” at Nelson Mandela’s memorial service.  To be honest, I don’t recall hearing a conversation about the selfie on the conservative talk radio show that I listen to daily, but I did hear other comments about Mandela that weren’t positive, which I expected- you have to be a regular listener to know the level of support one caller gets when he links Mugabe, Mandela, and Obama together.  One of Uncle Henry’s callers can’t resist calling- leaving a voice mail- weekly, it seems, about how awful President Obama is and how “Obama is destroying the nation.”  This caller isn’t known for sugarcoating his language as he has on several occasions referred to human beings on welfare as maggots and parasites.  So why should Burton Leflore enter into the proverbial hornet’s nest? 

Burton LeFlore’s appearance on the Uncle Henry Show would be going into hostile territory, no doubt, but he can do it and win over a small percentage of the people who listen, but do not call the show (most people who listen to talk radio do not actually call the shows).  LeFlore has participated in at least one debate during the Special Election where he was the sole Democrat surrounded by Republican candidates and an audience expecting a conservative message (http://lagniappemobile.com/ten-congressional-candidates-debate-a-week-before-primary/). But this will be different. This will be callers who are anonymous to those who aren’t regular listeners and they will talk about how they distrust President Obama and question Leflore’s (and African American’s) loyalty to the Democratic Party.  But LeFlore can handle this.  He can prepare the best 1 minute response to questions about the Affordable Health Care Act, his opinion of President Obama and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi, the national deficit, the recent budget agreement, and maybe a call or two about Common Core as that is what a couple of regular callers like to call about regularly.  The only caller that may throw him for a loop is the caller who will ask him about the federal reserve- just prepare a generic response in advance. Bradley Byrne was asked a question about sanctuary churches during his last appearance and he feigned ignorance on the matter (talking about a controversial immigration matter and whether your religious institution would sanction “law breakers” is not something a "conservative" politician running for a congressional seat in Mobile, Alabama wants to answer on election day unless it is a definitive  “send them all back to where they came from illegally” response, but I digress). Oh, and as tempting as it will be to accurately state the national debt tripled under the Reagan Administration, avoid saying anything negative about Reagan as you want to stay on the hosts good side.  And if something about Reagan slips out, follow up immediately with a Roll Tide and, golly, I sure hope Nick Saban remains in Alabama. Well don’t say golly;).

The Uncle Henry Show is very popular and given the number of people who called his show following the Special Election run-off between Bradley Byrne and Dean Young (the Republican establishment candidate v. the Tea Party candidate as it was deemed) stating that they were so upset with Byrne that they would be willing to vote for Burton LeFlore to send a message to the Republican Establishment, it is worth a try to appeal to these listeners.   Dean Young, on a previous appearance on the Uncle Henry Show, said that if he lost the run-off that he would neither endorse, nor vote for Bradley Byrne because of what he perceived was Byrne’s constant misrepresentation of his (Young’s) work.  He repeated this on election night after it was evident that Byrne received the majority of the votes.  I listened to every appearance of Dean Young on the Uncle Henry Show, including the one broadcast from a local business that supported Dean Young and his last appearance that was actually supposed to be a debate between Young and Byrne.  Byrne had to cancel his appearance because his brother was in the hospital and only had a very little time to live.  His brother died soon after (http://blog.al.com/live/2013/10/dale_byrne_brother_of_congress.html).  On a quick sidenote, we do have to realize that these candidates are human beings with real problems and Byrne is to be commended for taking a break from the campaign to do what is far more important, spending as much time with a loved one as possible during his final hours on this earth.  Anyway,  although the debate was cancelled, Young continued with his appearance, with a reporter from The Guardian in tow.  The interview at the commercial business was much more productive and endearing than his last interview on the Uncle Henry Show, which took place on October 24th. At one point, Dean Young became flustered and told the callers that they need to back off.  Uncle Henry plays his saying “y'all need to back off” frequently. Here is what I tweeted at the time: “Artemesia Stanberry ‏@artiestan 24 Oct

Y'all need to back off and stop lying- Young to a caller asking about military record. Back off was said 6 times in 2 minutes

 

As mentioned, Young said on this show and on election night that he would not support Bradley Byrne. After the election, a well-known caller and figure in the community said he’d actually think about voting for a Democrat out of frustration over how Byrne and the Republican establishment treated Young. Here is what I tweeted following that comment:


Dr. Ben George just said on @unclehenry that he has never voted for a Dem but he is thinking about voting for @LeFloreCampaign WOW! #al01

 

Several callers called after that and in the days following the run-off election echoing the same sentiment.  And one person who called the Uncle Henry Show who is not a regular said this: 


A good line from call to @unclehenry show regarding D. Young- "There is a difference between boldness and belligerence." #AL01

 

Burton LeFlore has consistently come off and being calm and willing to listen to the opposition.  And in his last debate between him and Bradley Byrne, he took bold stances on the issue (http://www.wkrg.com/story/24139880/byrne-and-leflore-square-off-on-issues).  When Bradley Byrne had his rescheduled debate appearance on the Uncle Henry Show on the day of the Special Election, many Dean Young supporters cried foul.  They thought this was an unfair advantage for Bradley Byrne and may have swayed the election.  FYI- Young did call during the show. Now, I did say that Uncle Henry is popular, but the idea that that one appearance before an audience that had heard both candidates and their supporters (with Dean Young supporters having the edge) so often swayed an election is a bit hard to believe. The election was close, 52%- 47% (http://blog.al.com/live/2013/11/final_results_from_tuesdays_al_1.html)  Besides, the audience is conservative and it is liberals, not conservatives, who respond to emotion and gut reactions, wink, wink.  Even with an audience that believes that Democrats are bad and Democrats who support President Obama are the worst people in the world, Burton LeFlore can win over listeners by showing that he is a human being who cares about the 1st District of Alabama and will work to promote the interests of the 1st District.  And if people want to vote for him on December 17th, 2013 out of spite, out of true support, or out of belief that he is the person who can bring a middle of the road approach to dealing with Republicans and Democrats , then so be it, choose your reason to vote for him.  I do not know Burton LeFlore, but I am familiar with the history of his family in the City of Mobile.  The truth be told, there were two people that I hoped would run for the seat- this was before LeFlore made his announcement- one is a state rep who has a leadership role in the Alabama State Legislative body, has cross-over appeal, can appeal to disinterested voters, and could have done a pretty good job at raising funds, but I admire Burton LeFlore for running for a seat that everyone assumes will be a Republican seat for the foreseeable future.  I think even the most hardened conservatives could appreciate this as well.

In conclusion, Burton LeFlore could win a few more votes by going on a conservative talk show where voters are disgruntled and disappointed by 1) Jo Bonner’s decision to leave his seat to take a job with the University of Alabama system (almost double the pay, and he gets to work with his sister, the new President of the University of Alabama (the 1st female President of the University, by the way), thus causing the state to have a costly Special Election (http://www.wkrg.com/story/22471895/special-election-will-cost-taxpayers-2-million)  and 2) very disgruntled Dean Young supporters.  One of Bradley Byrne’s supporters commented on how few voters came out to support LeFlore during the Special Election.  Understand, the Special Election took place in September and the game in town was the 9 Republican candidates vying to make it on the December 17th ballot that would determine who will replace former Rep. Jo Bonner.  But a lot has happened since then and it is not a guarantee that the increased turn-out that was seen for the run-off  election that took place in November will be replicated on December 17th.  Bradley Bryne has put out a new commercial, Bradley Byrne is receiving endorsements, campaign cash, and making the rounds- I just saw his twitter pic of an event in Citronelle, Alabama this week- but the number of people wanting to even think about another election one week before a major holiday, let along going to actually vote will be small.  What if Burton LeFlore provided the best candidate appearance on the Uncle Henry Show on election day? And what if he were to promote it in a way that the local media would cover the show during their midday and 5 and 6pm news broadcasts?  It may just, just maybe, just perhaps, suppose it could be, dare I say, a Christmas miracle.   Go for it, Burton LeFlore.  Call Uncle Henry and book the show for Tuesday, December 17th, if you have not done so.  Bradley Byrne will be a guest on Monday, December 16th,  do your appearance on December 17th and show your supporters how you can win voters and influence listeners.  For Uncle Henry, if Burton LeFlore does appear on your show on election day and does not win, then whenever a Dean Young supporter accuses you of helping Byrne to win by having him on on election day, if LeFlore doesn’t win you can tell them to back off, y’all just need to back off.

My Two Cents.

Peace,

Artemesia Stanberry

 

Previous blog posts relating to the 1st congressional district of Alabama: http://freerodneystanberry.com/blog/2013/05/28/best-wishes-and-farewell-congressman-jo-bonner/

http://alabamajustice.blogspot.com/2013/06/better-know-district-alabama-1st.html

Sunday, November 24, 2013

I did it, I saw 12 Years a Slave: Reflections


Blog by Artemesia Stanberry

“I did it, I saw 12 Years a Slave”

From the movie: He better be lucky he is free and white.  This is said by a slave owner in the film who thought he was duped by a white man. You know that commercial that said it is a good thing it is not this or that, that it is better to be this and that- for example nuts and bolts is better than nuts or bolts?  Well, Solomon Northup knew that the “and” was extremely important because being free and black rendered you nothing more than potential property. Being free and white, just resulted in anger at being duped by a fellow white man. I just came from seeing “12 years a Slave.” I do recommend it- highly.

 I am always reluctant to see movies such as this as I read and study the history of slavery in this country and its aftermath, and unlike so many in this country, I can’t sugarcoat the brutality of the institution. So hearing how real it was, I didn’t think I could actually see it at a movie theater. But I did finally see it because there are threemovies that I want to see (Homefront- I do like Jason Stratham in movies, Best Man Holiday and Black Nativity and didn’t want to venture out to see either before seeing 12 years). You know what it is like to stand in line to get onto a rollercoaster that you really don’t want to ride, but once you are strapped in, you are in it for the ride. That’s how I felt. When the clicks made as the roller coaster ascends, your stomach churns for you know what is in store for you.  The tears started flowing in my eyes during the previews.  There was a movie- I forget the name of it, but it involves fighting and Woody Harrelson is in it- that had a character named Rodney. And he ended up missing and his brother says I am not going to give up on finding Rodney.  My cousin, who remains in prison for crimes he did not commit, name is Rodney and I’ve been in a 17 year battle to free and exonerate him. He is on my mind almost 24 hours a day and sometimes the feelings are so raw that the mere mention of his name brings tears to my eyes. Tears because he remains incarcerated and tears because I feel as if I failed him by not being able to bring about justice.  This is what I live with daily.  Anyway, that started the tears and then the Black Nativity preview- I mean you have a story of struggle and redemption with gospel music as a sound track. C’mon.

Anyway, when the previews ended, I braced myself for what I knew would be a roller coaster of emotions as the life of Solomon Northup would be played out on the big screen before me.  Northup was a talented violinist with a stable family life parallel to the brutal institution of slavery that existed. He resided in New York. In 1841, as he was visiting our nation’s capital to take advantage of what free men take for granted, the opportunity to perform a task on one’s own terms and to be compensated justly for it.  But he was free AND Black, not free AND White, so he became a cog in the machine of capitalism-the machine that operated on free labor and considered people as property to reconcile the notion that all men/people are created free.  As one of his more brutal masters said in the movie, they are my property so I do not have any qualms about treating them as such.  The same person, as I recalled, compared them to baboons- he had no problem fathering children by forcing himself on what he saw as baboons.  Solomon is devastated to find himself in this position and when he insists that he is free, he is beaten to a bloody pulp until he could leave that holding cell without uttering to anyone that he is a free man named Solomon.  Instead, he is a slave named Platt. It is now when his eyes begin to open to the parallel universe that he and his family certainly knew to have existed but who believed in the Declaration of Independence, not realizing that a compromise in the United States Constitution was to allow runaway slaves, re property, to be returned to their property owners.  But, he was a free man, what should that matter to him.  Ah, but he was free AND black, not free AND white.  There was money in slavery, relatively few owned slaves, many, many more benefitted from the institution- including the slave catchers, the free people catchers, the owners of the holding pen (Paul Giamatti, it will take me awhile to stop hating you-just kidding, but don’t feel like putting an lol in this post- watch the film, you’ll understand).  Solomon witnessed the love of a mother for her children and the apathetic nature of those dealing in slaves had towards keeping that mother and her children together.  He witnessed the extreme nature of the jealous wife of a slave holder who couldn’t understand why her husband preferred, what was it- a baboon- over her- I can’t dare lie in bed with you, wish I could remember the rest of her dialogue. To which he said, wife, don’t make me choose you or her because… well, go and watch the movie.

The fragile nature of freedom, the destruction of families, the process of dehumanization, the strength of perseverance of the human spirit, the failings of man (and woman) were captured in this film.  Solomon Northup had to remain vigilant to obtain his freedom and he had to develop a level of trust in the basic humanity of others, even those who did not look like him. I don’t want to say too much for those who haven’t seen the movie or read the book, but within each of us is a sense of humanity, even when we see brutality and can live comfortably living alongside it, we can be challenged to escape our comfort zone for the benefit of others when asked to do so.  It took a leap faith for Solomon Northup to trust others after having relied on said trust led him to an institution of slavery and almost got him killed.  But if we lose this faith and this trust, and this belief that there are universal truths, then we render ourselves hostage to the actions of those deserving of nothing.

During the 1990s, I recall watching a movie about the drug sentencing laws, Guilt by Association, starring Mercedes Ruell.  It was based on true incidents involving the conspiracy theory (ie the portion of the drug sentencing act of 1988 that encouraged “snitching” to use popular vernacular, to get a sentence reduced). The premise was a mother who had a boyfriend who was dealing in drugs. She didn’t know, but because she answered a phone call when a dealer called and told her boyfriend that he had a call on the line, she became part of the conspiracy and ended up getting a lot of prison time.  After spending years in prison, she was finally able to get her prison sentence reduced.  As she was walking out, the cameras panned to the women around her, people deserving to be free just staring, as they would remain in the system indefinitely. I had that flashback as “12 Years” concluded.  “12 Years a Slave” and then finally free, as Northup rode off in what one would not and could not dare call a sunset after what the physical and mental torture he’d endured, Patsy and so many others remained behind.  The legal institution of slavery ended in 1865 with the passage of the 13th Amendment, and then another form of slavery began, after all the 13th Amendment reads “Neither Slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime whereof the party have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to its jurisdiction. People, as was the case during slavery, found a way to build wealth off of free labor. Again, a small number of people with an army of soldiers willing to use other human beings because to be free AND white became a bit more fragile in post-slavery America, so there had to be some sort continuation of social capital attached to skin color. I invite you to read Douglas Blackmon’s book  Slavery By Another Name AND/or watch the PBS documentaryhttp://video.pbs.org/video/2176766758/).There is so much more that can be written,  but I will bring this to a conclusion.

To Nick Cannon, I say more movies do need to be made about those enslaved in the mode that Steve McQueen made this one. I understand what you mean about showing positive images of African Americans and how people enslaved were not savages and had identities, that Africa was not a dark continent waiting for the transatlantic slave trade to come about to change lives for the better under the guidance of Christianity, but far too many people do not understand the true nature of slavery, the fragility of freedom, the wealth that was built off of uncompensated free labor and the generational consequences of the institution. John Conyers can’t even get a bill passed about studying reparations (H.R. 40), but Ronald Reagan can use the term “welfare queen” and get people to focus on his version of a welfare queen wanting unearned benefits and less on Steve McQueen’s portrayal of Patsy, who never got the benefits she and so many others earned for building this country’s wealth. We can’t wish Patsy away, we can’t wish this history away. This isn’t to say dwell on it, it isn’t to say hate people, it isn’t to say that we haven’t come a long way as a country; rather, it is to say remember it as a legacy of this country and to stop perpetuating the same mistakes of using human beings as commodities.  Reading Michelle Alexander’s book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness and the recent ACLU report on the number of nonviolent offenders given life sentences (https://www.aclu.org/living-death-sentenced-die-behind-bars-what) and collectively ask why does this continue to happen and who does it benefit?  

For the record, and this should go without saying, I believe we are all human beings first and foremost. I have and will continue to have acquaintances of all colors of the rainbow.  The necessity to remember, embrace, and learn from the past does not diminish who we are and can continue to be as a nation.  Remember an episode from A Different World when Dwayne Wayne and Ron Johnson are at a football game? They come back to their car to see someone scrawling with black paint N----r on the car. It was actually Nigg before Dwayne was able to stop the person. Well each of the individuals are placed in a holding cell because a fight broke out.  The person doing the spray painting starts saying how his great grandparents immigrated to this country and made a way for themselves with nothing to which Dwayne Wayne says very emotionally, my ancestors built this country.  The police intervenes, the officer is a white gentleman with a southern accent speaks and Ron and Dwanye dismissed him, thinking he didn’t understand their struggles. It turns out that the officer had marched with Dr. King and understood the struggles and attempted to diffuse the situation and say you don’t know what a person is about by looking at them. As the individuals were released and heading back to the car, someone had spelled out the read of the N’word on the car.  Dwanye, Ron and the person who started the word looked at one another and said I’ll see you next week- for community service. It was a look that said let’s start here, to understand one another, so that we all can move forward. That’s how I feel. Forgive me for taking some liberties with this A Different World episode but it’s been probably 2 decades since I saw it.  12 Years a Slave, see the movie.

Peace, 

Artemesia Stanberry
 

All views expressed in these blogs are mine, as an individual citizen. Sometimes one needs more space than just twitter and Facebook to express one’s views. This is the purpose of this blog, nothing more and nothing less. With regard to the reference to Rodney K. Stanberry, more information about this wrongful conviction can be found at www.freerodneystanberry.com or www.freerodneystanberry.com/blog

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

An Agape type of Love: Is it Possible Between the Tea Party and President Obama?



October 8, 2013

An Agape type of Love: Is it Possible Between the Tea Party and President Obama?

This weekend, I was able to watch a few soccer games and I was able to read some of the work of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  I ended up watching a lot soccer games by chance; I was flipping through the channels and saw a game in the English Premier League. I then watched the game immediately following it, an MLS game later that evening and then capped with another game on Sunday.  But the reading of works by Dr. King was not by chance.  As someone who is an advocate for an individual who remains in prison for crimes he did not commit (Rodney K. Stanberry, www.freerodneystanberry.com), I find myself taking in Dr. King’s words from time to time.  While we are experiencing our personal injustice, Dr. King led a movement against unjust acts and unjust laws in the face of continued criticism and threats to his life. I am always amazed at the level of commitment he and so many others had to the issue of equality, economic security for all, and ending oppression while using a non-violent method. As a person who is non-violent and who is a prisoner of hope, Dr. King and Ghandi are two people that I truly admire.  Both of these gentlemen could have had relatively comfortable lives, even in the face of oppression.  I revisited Dr. King’s speech entitled “Love, Law and Disobedience” delivered by Dr. King in November 1961 (for those who not realize this, Dr. King has a body of work before and after the March on Washington and he was more than a dreamer, as my good friend Dr. Wilmer Leon writes each year on the commemoration of Dr. King’s birthday. 

Agape Love
This weekend, I was not reading Dr. King to make sense of what is happening with my cousin or to gather some solace in his words as is usually the case.  Rather, I was reading his work to make some sense of some of these extreme comments I hear about President Obama.  In particular, I was listening to a talk radio show out of Mobile, AL last Thursday evening when I heard this vile rant against President Obama regarding the government shutdown.  The talk show host was talking about the veterans on the Honor Flight who went to Washington, DC to see the World War II Memorial.  These Honor Flights are organized to provide WWII veterans with an opportunity to visit the monument dedicated to them.  One such Honor Flight took place during the shutdown and the host indicated that Obama, with a spirit of hate, had barricades put up to keep the veterans out.  He called President Obama “a sorry so and so” who hates you and who hates the American people.  He used the term King Obama instead of President, I am not sure if he has uttered the words President Obama, but on that evening, he went on a rant about King Obama.  I was taken aback by the comments, even as I have heard the host before and know that he is active in the Tea Party in Mobile, Alabama. He has even run for office. If I recall correctly, he said on another talk show that he did not run for the vacant Alabama First Congressional District seat because he wanted to help now Mayor-Elect Sandy Stimpson defeat Mayor Sam Jones, the first African American to be elected to the position of Mayor in Mobile (I’m not indicating that he wanted Jones defeated because of his race; rather, I’m just pointing out a historic fact).  My reaction after hearing the host is that the First Congressional District of Alabama does not need to elect any person who endorses those views.  Yet, both candidates who made are in a run-off campaign after being the top two vote getters in a 9 person race on the Republican ticket (http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/DS/20130925/NEWS02/309250048/Byrne-Young-GOP-runoff-1st-Congressional-District) will seek the endorsement of the talk show host and the popular Tea Party group that he is affiliated with.   The First Congressional District of Alabama deserves a moderate candidate whether it is a moderate Democrat or a moderate Republican that will not come to Congress with the idea that the person at the top of the executive branch hates the American people.  How can we move forward as a nation when people who detest the president will see negotiating with him as being tantamount to treason? And I say this regardless of the President in office at the time. Goodness knows that if I held a certain mentality, I would have encouraged a governmental shutdown over all sorts of issues, including tax cuts in the middle of a war and a recession, this only helped to further inflate the debt and deficit, but I digress.  Mobile has brought in industry such as Austal Shipbuilding and Airbus, a city in the district, Prichard, Alabama, has brought in a high profile police chief from New Jersey/New York, and even the Mayor Elect seems to be bringing in people who are willing to work with the community in order to improve upon what has been done and to make the city even better.   So, again, I was bothered by that rant, perhaps of the fact that it was an anger-filled rant.  And this brings me back to why I was reading Dr. King’s work this weekend.  I often think about what Dr. King says about an agape type of love, a love that will enable you to love your enemies even as they are oppressing you.  Here is a quote from the aforementioned work:

…Then the Greek language comes out another word which is called the agape. Agape is more than romantic love, agape is more than friendship. Agape is understanding, creative, redemptive, good will to all men.  It is an overflowing love which seeks nothing in return.  Theologians would say that it is the love of God operating in the human heart.  So that when one arises to love on this level, he loves men not because he likes them, not because their ways appeal to him, but because he loves every man because God loves him. And he rises to the point of loving the person who does an evil deed while hating the deed that the person does.  I think this is what Jesus meant when he said ‘love your enemies.’ I’m very happy he didn’t say like your enemies, because it is pretty difficult to like some people. Like is sentimental, and it is pretty difficult to like someone bombing your home; it is pretty difficult of like someone who is threatening your children; it is difficult to like congressman who spend all of their time trying to defeat civil rights.  But Jesus says love them, and love is greater than like.  Love is understanding, redemptive, creative, good will for all men. And it is this idea, it is this whole ethic of love which is the idea standing at the basis of the student movement.” (“Love, Law and Civil Disobedience,” in A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr., HarperSanfranciso:1986, P 47)

These words are powerful to the believer and non-believer as it helps to reconcile the anger one feels towards injustice to the belief that human beings have the capacity to do what is right and just, and, therefore, it is important to not lash out with hate. To the talk show host that I am referring to, you can dislike President Obama and detest his policies, but can you find it within your heart to at least apologize for saying that he is a “sorry so and so” and say that while you don’t like President Obama, you respect and love him as a human being?  Dr. King faced extreme oppression, including people bombing his home because he dared to push for equal rights and human rights for all.   He died not in an armed robbery, but because he dared to rob people advocating and sanctioning white supremacy from the idea that people are inferior based on race.  He experienced threats not because he opposed Jim Crow by drinking at a water fountain, but because he opposed Jim Crow by organizing a mass movement based on non-violence, a heightened level of humanity that states that you do not have to fight violence with violence to achieve a goal, and he became public enemy number 1 in some circles not because he used the freedom of speech afforded to him behind a microphone, but because he dared to break the silence of allowing the military industrial complex steal from the idea of pursuing peace and tackling poverty in a comprehensive fashion (http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/pacificaviet/riversidetranscript.html). 

What is Sorry about President Obama? 

If Dr. King can refrain from calling various leaders “sorry so and so’s,” certainly we can refrain from this use of very unproductive language.  And beyond that, what has Barack Hussein Obama done to indicate that he is a sorry so and so.  Did he live a life of privilege getting ahead on the Obama name? No, he is a product of a single mother and absentee father, actually, absentee parents as his grandparents, one of whom served in WWII if I recall, who took advantage of what our society offers- education and opportunity.  He graduated from Ivy League universities and could have lived a life of luxury were it not his commitment to public service. He did serve as a community organizer, a state legislator, a husband and father, a United States Senator when he was only a handful of African Americans to ever serve in that capacity and only the third to be voted by his constituents to serve to becoming the first African American president of the United States.  There is nothing sorry about what he has achieved and there is nothing sorry about wanting to ensure that all Americans have access to basic health care, not via universal healthcare, a single payer system, or a public option, as many progressives wanted, but by trying to implement a conservative idea of personal choice and responsibility.  How many citizens have been denied health care because of a preexisting condition? How many Americans took and kept a job that may not have been the best for them because they were dependent on the healthcare provided?  This plan that is the basis of this shutdown provides a freedom of choice and independence, that do come with a consequence to avoid what conservatives would label as free loaders- people who do not want to pay into the system, but receive the benefits- ie going to an emergency room for health care without health insurance ( here is one article making the conservative case for the Affordable Health Care Act http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/30/opinion/sunday/why-obamacare-is-a-conservatives-dream.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.)  Certainly the affordable health care act is far from being perfect, but for the multi millions of individuals without insurance and who want a choice, it is a step in the right direction.

The Right of  a President to Pursue an Agenda

As someone who was dually elected by the American people, President Obama had a right to present his agenda, which included the Affordable Health Care Act.  This was not kept secret as he discussed it on the campaign trail, both houses in Congress debated the act and the summer after it was presented, there were lots of town hall meetings with constituents shouting down members of Congress.  The legislation passed after much compromise, and the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law.  For President Obama to be on the receiving end of a rant developed over blaming him for the National Park sites, including the WWII Memorial, to be closed is taking opposition to this President too far. Perhaps the talk show host in question could lead a group of people back to the National Mall and insist on the barriers be moved from the Dr. King Memorial so that his words of guidance and leadership could sink in.  That is, of course, if they didn’t believe King Obama would forbid them from paying reverence to the words of another King. I jest, surely I jest. 

Peace,


Artemesia Stanberry

PS  Rachael Maddow Show on how Democratic Congresswoman introduced a bill to create a World War II Memorial, with very little support initially: http://video.msnbc.msn.com/rachel-maddow/53162118